Which of the following is NOT a reason for the Commission to revoke a FHV Probationary License?

The choice indicating that driving without a seatbelt is not a reason for revoking a FHV Probationary License is correct because such infractions are typically regarded as violations of vehicle safety regulations rather than serious criminal offenses that directly impact the driver's fitness or eligibility to operate a for-hire vehicle.

In the context of the other options, they represent significantly more serious violations. Being convicted for leaving the scene of an accident or refusing to take a breathalyzer test typically suggests a disregard for the law and can compromise public safety, thus justifying potential revocation of a driving license, particularly in the for-hire industry where passenger safety is paramount. Similarly, a conviction for impaired driving indicates a severe risk to public safety and reflects poorly on a driver’s reliability and responsibility.

In summary, while all driving violations are concerning, the nature of the offense is critical. Convictions such as driving without a seatbelt are treated more leniently compared to offenses that indicate a blatant disregard for public safety, which is why they do not carry the same weight in decisions regarding the revocation of a FHV Probationary License.